Medical Imaging Technology Association
About MITA
Adding Value to Patients' Lives and Value to the Economy
Fostering Efficiencies & Savings
About Medical Imaging
Media Center
News
Reports and Scientific Literature
Policy
Archives
Contact Us
Members Only
MITA Home

Print this page

CT Scans Reduce Unnecessary Appendix Surgeries

Every year, some 250,000 new cases of appendicitis develop in the U.S., requiring hospital admissions totaling more than one million patient days. Yet as many as 47 percent of the clinical diagnoses of acute appendicitis are wrong.1 Recent studies have shown that medical imaging can improve clinical judgment and reduce unneeded surgeries – in the process, reducing costs.

  • A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that routine use of CT scans in 100 consecutive cases of suspected appendicitis prevented 13 unneeded appendectomies (for a savings of $47,281) and 50 unneeded inpatient days (for a savings of $20,250.) After the cost of the CT studies for the 100 patients was subtracted, the total savings per patient overall was $447.2 Click here to view the study

    Effect of CT on Treatment and Resource Use for
    100 Patients with Suspected Appendicitis
    Treatment Change Dollar Value
    Savings  
         Avoided unnecessary appendectomies $47,281  
         Avoided observation for 1 day before appendectomy $8,505  
         Avoided observation for 1 day before treatment for CT
           diagnosed alternative condition
    $4,455  
         Avoided observation for 1 day before discharge $7,290  
    Costs  
         Appendiceal CT examinations $22,800  
    Overall Savings $44,731  
    Source: "Effect of Computed Tomography of the Appendix on Treatment of Patients and Use of Hospital Resources," by Patrick M. Rao, James T. Rhea, Robert A Novelline, Amy A. Mostafavi, and Charles J. McCabe, New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 338; pp. 141-146, January 15, 1998.

  • A study in Pediatrics found that using CT to diagnose appendicitis in children would reduce the number of unneeded operations and the number of days of inpatient observation prior to a diagnosis. Overall, total per patient costs would fall.3 Click here to view the study

    • At the same time, using CT would also reduce the amount of time to appendectomy for those children who truly suffered from appendicitis. The authors conclude that, "Obtaining CT scans on all children who are candidates for inpatient observation for suspected appendicitis would reduce both morbidity and cost."

CT = Less Cost, Unneeded Surgery for Kids
Outcomes, Costs for CT Strategies vs. Current Practice
 Inpatient Observation Days Missed AppendicitisTotal Operations Negative LaparotomiesPer Patient Cost
Current Strategy 487 3 112 26 $5,831
CT/then send home 0 3 93 7 $3,813
CT/then admit to hospital 363 0 93 7 $5,277
CT/WBC/then admit to hospital 370 2 97 11 $5,140
As shown in the left column, the current treatment strategy was compared to three strategies in which CT use was mandatory. The authors concluded that each of the CT stategies would have reduced the number of observation days, operations, negative laparotomies, and cost per patient. Source: “Effect of Computed Tomography on Patient Management and Costs in Children with Suspected Appendicitis,” Pediatrics, September 1999.


1 "More Precision in Diagnosing Appendicitis," McColl I, New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 338; 190-191, January 15, 1998.
2 "Effect of Computed Tomography of the Appendix on Treatment of Patients and Use of Hospital Resources," Patrick M. Rao, James T. Rhea, Robert A Novelline, Amy A. Mostafavi, and Charles J. McCabe, The New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 338; pp. 141-146, January 15, 1998.
3 "Effect of Computed Tomography on Patient Management and Costs in Children with Suspected Appendicitis," Barbara M. Garcia Pena, George A. Taylor, Dennis P. Lunc, and Kenneth D. Mandl, Pediatrics, Vol. 104, No. 3, pp 440-446, September 1999.


                                                                                                                                   

  © 2008 - National Electrical Manufacturers Association
Terms & Conditions